This entry is quite long, wordy and totally opinion so if you want to just skip over this entry, feel free. I know that I probably wouldn't waste all my time reading this garbage either.
Now that Garth is taking a logic class, he feels the need to apply what he is learning in every day life. Aside from being annoying most of the time because I am usually not making a very logical argument when I talk, it has brought up some good thoughts and ideas. One day on the bus we got to talking about music when we hear Burr Song 2 on the radio. Instantly, I remember the last time that I had heard the song which believe it or not dates all the way back to New Years Eve 2008 when AFI did a horrible cover of the song on MTV. This truly signaled to both Garth and I the end of the band AFI as a viable punk rock band as they successfully managed to sell out to the mainstream crowd. This topic of conversation soon lead to a rousing discussion on how one can tell if a band has really "sold out" or if they are simply finding new ways to expand and grow as artist.
I guess it all comes down the change. Change can be a great thing but also a very bad thing depending on the type of change and the extent of it in the music, look, attitude, of a band. Bands that never change are redundant and boring. MxPx is one of those bands. While we all love Chick Magnet, I think that every single album that they have ever come out with since holds true to the same formula of Southern California skater punk. To be quite frank, I have just stopped caring about them all together, mostly just because I know what I am going to get from them time after time.
First, I suppose that a definition of selling out has to be established to really make the point. In my personal opinion I define selling out as changing the over all feel, style, looking, personality or music of a band to such an extent for the sole purpose of making more money or to become more popular.
It is a fine line between selling out and the avant garde. All artists are trying to push the envelope, trying to redefine something and become new and refreshing. I guess that is the endless struggle of art and this is not just found in music but all forms of art. No one wants to listen to something that they have already heard, or see something that they have all ready seen. In the words of NOFX (Maybe not the most credible source), "The music they're making, reminds me of song sung in the 70's. You might fool the kids, but you don't fool me. Have you ever heard of something called originality?" Ultimately the bands that leave the biggest impact are the bands that do this successfully.
One perfect example of this in my mind are The Beatles. Like them or hate them, you have to recognize just how give of an impact they had on music as we know it today and why is that you might ask? In my opinion it is because they weren't afraid to change, to improve, to write something that challenges the boundaries and pushes you to think in new ways about new issues. It all comes down to that. I believe that changes that bands make need to be focused on trying to push boundaries and not simply cash grab.
I guess I take a bigger interest in the subject than most especially since I have started to study music in school. It is very interesting the ways that people listen to music. Many simple are content with anything as long as it has a good beat and is danceable. This type of listening is completely normal and acceptable. Music is seen as a sort of retreat and away to relax or relieve stress. Recently in one of my classes though we got to talking about popular music and the differences between it and say a classical piece or music that might never make it to the upper reaches of the charts. Our professor started to explain to us that in many instances, music that is written to be very popular, especially on the radio or clubs and bars is recorded in such a way that all of the sound is compressed and made to be louder so that even in situations where maybe there is a lot of noise like in a club, that all of the parts of the music can be hear. While this may serve it's purpose, he went on to explain that many of the subtleties of the music that are created are lost when subjected to this process and that thus, a lot of popular music has the same sort of feel or sound while music that maybe not be recorded in this fashion remains true to how the music was originally recorded in the first place. Needless to say, I think that this is all part of the selling out process. Bands that are looking to change so that they can get popular appeal, and money can and usually do submit their music to this type of recording habits.
I guess in closing, my point is that we need to be more critically thinking of the music that we spend our time listening to. Don't listen to something just because it is on the radio, or just because lots of people listen to it. Find your own style. Listen to music that makes you want to be a better person and that drives you to do something better with your life, themes that often times can't be found amongst bands striving to mesmerize the masses into spending millions just to find that cool new sound.